Talking with other people in a friendly way can make it easier to solve common problems, a new University of Michigan study shows. But conversations that are competitive in tone, rather than cooperative, have no cognitive benefits. “This study shows that simply talking to other people, the way you do when you’re making friends, can provide mental benefits,” said psychologist Oscar Ybarra, a researcher at the U-M Institute for Social Research (ISR). Ybarra is the lead author of the study, which is forthcoming in the peer-reviewed journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. For the study, the researchers examined the impact of brief episodes of social contact on one key component of mental activity—executive function. This type of cognitive function includes working memory, self-monitoring, and the ability to suppress external and internal distractions—all of which are essential in solving common
life problems. In previous research, Ybarra has found that social interaction provides a short-term boost to executive function that’s comparable in size to playing brain games, such as solving crossword puzzles. In the current series of studies, he and colleagues tested 192 undergraduates to pinpoint which types of social interactions help—and which don’t. They found that engaging in brief (10 minute) conversations in which participants were simply instructed to get to know another person resulted in boosts to their subsequent performance on an array of common cognitive tasks. But when participants engaged in conversations that had a competitive edge, their performance on cognitive tasks showed no improvement. “We believe that performance boosts come about because some social interactions induce people to try to read others’ minds and take their perspectives on things,” Ybarra said. “And we also find that when we structure even competitive interactions to have an element of taking the other person’s perspective, or trying to put yourself in the other person’s shoes, there is a boost in executive functioning as a result.” The studies further showed that the improvement in mental function was limited to tasks assessing executive function. Neither processing speed nor general knowledge were affected by the type of social
interaction engaged in by participants. “Taken together with earlier research, these findings highlight the connection between social intelligence and general intelligence,” Ybarra said. “This fits with evolutionary perspectives that examine social pressures on the emergence of intelligence, and research showing a neural overlap between social-cognitive and executive brain functions.”The research also has some practical implications for improving performance on certain kinds of intellectual tasks. If you want to perform your best, having a friendly chat with a colleague before a big presentation or test may be a good strategy. Also, in competitive contexts that occur in some organizations, be aware that you may inadvertently fail to support your cognitive flexibility and focus. – Oscar Ybarra firstname.lastname@example.org Professor of Psychology Ph.D. New Mexico State University Area: Social. Research and Teaching Interests I conduct research on social intelligence and how people navigate their web of relationships in a mixed motive world.My research programs fall along four lines, and the common denominator is that the social and the intellectual support each other. I study how people understand and make decisions about the social aspects of the world versus those related to tasks and work, how people make decisions about others
and the cognitive biases that may preclude creating social connections, how social interaction and relationships support and enhance cognitive abilities and performance, and how the cognitively stimulating nature of social interaction is affected by trust and the extent to which people mentalize and attempt to coordinate with one another. – Established in 1949, the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research (ISR) is the world’s largest academic social science survey and research organization, and a world leader in developing and applying social science methodology, and in educating researchers and students from around the world. ISR conducts some of the most widely-cited studies in the nation, including the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, the American National Election Studies, the Monitoring the Future Study, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the Health and Retirement Study, the Columbia County Longitudinal Study and the National Survey of Black Americans. ISR researchers also collaborate with social scientists in more than 60 nations on the World Values Surveys and other projects, and the Institute has established formal ties with universities in Poland, China, and South Africa. ISR is also home to the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), the world’s largest digital social science data archive. Visit the ISR Web site at www.isr.umich.edu for more information. News from: University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research
Caro amico lettore, Good News è un progetto aperto e accetta la collaborazione di chiunque abbia voglia di far circolare novità positive.
Inviaci le tue proposte (articoli, vignette, foto e video divertenti).
Sostieni l’unico e-magazine dedicato alle buone notizie, facendo una donazione.
Good News, good, news, network, positive, uplifting, l’agenzia di buone notizie e ufficio comunicati stampa online di informazione alternativa e positiva, di salute naturale ecoturismo bioedilizia, agricoltura biologica, alimentazione naturale, energie alternative fantascienza, misteri, parapsicologia, lavoro etico, autoaiuto, selfhelp, webreader, sapere.it,