After a Fight with a Partner, Brain Activity Predicts Emotional Resiliency. Activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex is an indicator emotion regulation in day-to-day life. Common wisdom tells us that for a successful relationship partners shouldn’t go to bed angry. But new research from a psychologist at Harvard University suggests that brain activity—specifically in the region called the lateral prefrontal cortex—is a far better indicator of how someone will feel in the days following a fight with his or her partner.
Individuals who show more neural activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex are less likely to be upset the day after fighting with partners, according to a study in this month’s Biological Psychiatry. The findings point to the lateral prefrontal cortex’s role in emotion regulation, and suggest that improved function within this region may also improve day-to-day mood. “What we found, as you might expect, was that everybody felt badly on the day of the conflict with their partners,” says lead author Christine Hooker, assistant professor of psychology in Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences. “But the day after, people who had high lateral prefrontal cortex activity felt better and the people who had low lateral prefrontal cortex activity continued to feel badly.” Hooker’s co-authors are Özlem Ayduk, Anett Gyurak, Sara Verosky, and Asako Miyakawa, all of the University of California at Berkeley. Research has previously shown that the lateral prefrontal cortex is associated with emotion regulation in laboratory
tests, but the effect has never been proven to be connected to experiences in day-to-day life. This study involved healthy couples in a relationship for longer than three months. While in an fMRI scanner, participants viewed pictures of their partners with positive, negative, or neutral facial expressions and their neural activity was recorded while reacting to the images. While in the lab, participants were also tested for their broader cognitive control skills, such as their ability to control impulses and the shift and focus of attention. For three weeks, the couples also recorded in an online diary their daily emotional state and whether they had had a fight with their partners. Hooker found that participants who displayed greater activity in their lateral prefrontal cortex while viewing their partners’ negative facial expressions in the scanner were less likely to report a negative mood the day after a fight with their partners, indicating that they were better able to emotionally “bounce back”
after the conflict. She also found that those who had more activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex and greater emotional regulation after a fight displayed more cognitive control in laboratory tests, indicating a link between emotion regulation and broader cognitive control skills. “The key factor is that the brain activity in the scanner predicted their experience in life,” says Hooker. “Scientists believe that what we are looking at in the scanner has relevance to daily life, but obviously we don’t live our lives in a scanner. If we can connect what we see in the scanner to somebody’s day-to-day emotion-regulation capacity, it could help psychologists predict how well people will respond to stressful events in their lives.” While Hooker acknowledges that more work must be done to develop clinical applications for the research, it may be that lateral prefrontal cortex function provides information about a person’s vulnerability to develop mood problems after a stressful event. This raises the question as to whether increasing lateral prefrontal cortex function will improve emotion regulation capacity.
The research was funded by the National Institute for Mental Health and the National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression. Christine Hooker | HarvardScience. Christine Hooker Bio : received her Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Northwestern University in 2002. She completed her clinical training at the VA Northern California and then worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow and later a Research Professor in the Neuroscience Institute at the University of California at Berkeley. She is now an Assistant Professor in the Psychology Department at Harvard University. Her research uses functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to investigate neural mechanisms that facilitate social functioning in healthy adults and patients with schizophrenia disorder. Her work has been supported by the National Institute of Health, the MIND Institute, and the National Association for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression. Research Summary : Social Neuroscience and Psychopathology (SNAP) Laboratory Research in the lab
is focused on the behavioral and neural mechanisms of social functioning in healthy adults and individuals suffering from psychiatric problems, with a particular emphasis on social functioning in schizophrenia and related disorders. Individuals with schizophrenia have problems building and maintaining social relationships. The lab is investigating the exact nature of social functioning deficits, the consequences that it creates for schizophrenia patients, and how these deficits can be improved. The lab is also committed to investigating core social processes in healthy adults as way to better understand social dysfunction in psychopathology. We are using fMRI, diary methods, and video observation techniques to better understand processes such as empathy, emotion regulation in interpersonal relationships, interpreting the intentions of others, social anhedonia, and the effect of emotion on social judgments. news from harvard.edu
this is an open project and accepts the help of anyone willing to make positive thinking…
Send your proposals (articles, cartoons, funny pictures and videos) and find an open door where to move your ideas … POSITIVE!
Support and Spread the only e-magazine dedicated to good news and smiles!
Write to: email@example.com
Show on your site a link to our www.goodnews.ws